How to Read the Bible: A Non-Cringy Guide

The Bible is not an easy read. In fact, it’s downright daunting when you think about it. I say that as both a Christian and a reader.

Where do you start? And does it matter what the Catholic church teaches about it?

The Christian Bible is a collection of books (history books and letters and apocalyptic literature and poetry and prophecy and creation stories and parables and proverbs), and when you consider that the church was its first editor and compiler, I do think it helps to know what they have to say about it. The Reformers had something to say about it too, but that’s a story for another day.

There are a few questions I’ve been asking myself lately, as I consider how to write about the Bible on this blog. I feel equipped to answer them not because I am a Biblical scholar or theologian, but because I have had a lot of time to experience and interact with the Bible over the course of my life. I’m familiar with Catholic and Protestant theology and have spent time with both types of churches. The answers I’ve come up with are not meant to be definitive, but thought provoking.

Shouldn’t I be able to pick up the Bible and start reading it anywhere I want, in any way that I want, without any specific interpretation or guidance? Sure. Just like I could pick up any ancient text and get something of value. But I would also add that an interpretive guide would be an advantage rather than a detriment.

Should I ignore guidance on Biblical interpretation from the church if I’m an atheist or I’m distrustful of religious institutions? I would say no, because understanding what the church teaches about the Bible does not mean you have to agree with it (either in whole or in part). Your opinion of that teaching does not negate the value of learning it.

What about Jesus? How do my thoughts and opinions about Jesus fit into a Bible reading plan? No matter what your personal beliefs are about Jesus, an understanding of how the church sees him is fundamental to understanding much of the symbolism and thematic content of the Bible. According to the church, it is the key to unlocking many otherwise obscure and problematic passages.

What about politics and all that socially conservative cringe I keep hearing about? If any of that’s in the Bible, then why should I bother reading it? Bias affects everything we read. We search for, and most often find, evidence to confirm what we already believe.

The belief that it is inherently good to accumulate and protect one’s personal wealth at all costs with no consideration for the common good, that women must be submissive and restricted in their roles within the church and society, and that issues such as sexual preference are of the utmost moral importance, will lead people to find passages to support those agendas. They may be taken out of context (ie. misinterpreted), but they will find a few. And that will be sufficient for them to construct a theological interpretation that is based on them.

It’s not a coincedence that these types of biased interpretations also support and maintain existing power structures and benefit the most privileged among us. That does not make them the correct interpretation or application of the Biblical texts. If anything, it makes them suspect.

Like every other text, the Bible speaks for itself. It speaks about matters of the human heart and social justice. And if you contend that Jesus is the key to understanding it, as the church teaches, what he told his followers makes for the best guide of all, if you wish to get the most out of reading the Bible.

“Teacher, which is the greatest commandment in the Law?” Jesus replied: “‘Love the Lord your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your mind.’ This is the first and greatest commandment. And the second is like it: ‘Love your neighbor as yourself.’ All the Law and the Prophets hang on these two commandments.”

Matthew 22:36-40 NIV (my emphasis)

The motive for reading the Bible should ideally include a desire to know God better so that we may love him (and learn of his love for us) and a desire to learn how we may better love our fellow humans.

Jesus leaves very little room here for self-serving, biased interpretations of the “law and the prophets”, if we’re being honest with ourselves. No one is perfect. And I’m not attacking social conservatives out of a desire to insult them. They deserve love and forgiveness, as we all do. However, the spirit of the Biblical text more often than not is in strong opposition to oppression in all its forms, and exhorts us to actively choose the side of the marginalized. It advocates for social justice over preservation of the status quo.

It’s also important to read Jesus’ words in context: He was being tested by none other than the infamous Pharisees. We have our own version of the Pharisees today. Why would we allow their interpretations of the Bible to taint our engagement with this fascinating and valuable text?

Can Old School Blogging Save My Writer’s Soul?

One of my all-time favorite songs is Video Killed the Radio Star by The Buggles. Ironically, video also killed the blog, as did every other social media platform.

I began my very first blog before social media as we know it today existed, and this is my fourth personal blog. There was a time when I used to post every day. Now I struggle to post once a month.

It seems like I’ve been forever trying to figure out how to write more. Of course I want to write better. But doesn’t writing more mean writing better? So why haven’t I been writing as much as I’d like to? The truth is I lost the feeling of joy at the thought of publishing a post to my blog a long time ago–circa 2009 to be precise.

Do you remember when blogs were interesting? Before branding and niches? When bloggers weren’t quite so…impersonal? So voiceless and polished? When posts weren’t SEO-driven, marketable (God I hate that word), and utilitarian? In those days, the blog was a humble and eclectic and sometimes messy but delightfully authentic treat to read. And to write.

Today’s blog is superficial. Unoriginal. The internet has been flooded with money-making blogs for the past decade. Blogs that are so full of ads and promotions, pop-ups and marketing (there’s that word again), that you can hardly find the content you were searching for.

The blog’s transformation from its organic, wholesome, democratic roots to a vapid capitalist enterprise was swift and tragic. It’s been quite the revelation to me that my writer’s soul has been one of its casualties. I had become plagued with perfectionism, preoccupied with keeping up with trends, and afraid of putting anything in writing that might not measure up to the standards of the marketplace.

It wasn’t that I no longer wanted to write, it was that I no longer wanted to write like that.

I don’t care how many words the experts say the ideal blog post should have. Or whether I have found the perfect Google-searched click-bait title. The one rule I am keeping is: the advantage of consistency for the content creator. No one wants to read a blog that posts inconsistently. I know I don’t.

My primary writing goal in 2021 is going to be to show up and write here as often as I can. No one has revelations like this every day, but there is something in the everyday and the ordinary worth sharing. My inner blog guru will try to make me feel small and unimportant, but the old school blogger in me says, “Write on!”

The old school blog is needed today, and I have a hunch I’m not the only one who misses it.